Welcome to ScapeCrunch

We are ScapeCrunch, the place where planted aquarium hobbyists come to build relationships and support each other. When you're tired of doom scrolling, you've found your home here.

No Fish?

Joined
Jan 30, 2026
Messages
24
Reaction score
51
Location
NC
I am seeing a bunch of planted tanks with what seems to be no fish. Is this a popular thing? How many of you guys do this? Is there just so few that you don't really see them in pictures? I guess I am struggling with the point of it. Why not just grow plants out of water? It seems like it would be a whole lot easier. Help me understand the appeal.
 
Fish often hide well in pics until folks look closely at larger pictures.

TwinstarDSCF4759 2ft dutch E1 show.webp

I've had 2 people ask why I didn't add fish to this tank, there are 50+ good sized fish actually.

DSCF9896 show stretch .webp

For many folks eliminating fish from the aquarium allows more drastic plant-focused actions to take place without worrying about fish, such as injecting CO2 to very high levels, or heavy use of algicides. This make it easier inexperienced folks to do large tank resets etc.
Can be useful for farm tanks where the only goal is to farm/collect plants, rather than viewing pleasure.
 
Growing plants out of water truly isn't the same as underwater. Terrariums, while beautiful, simply can never have the garden-eque nature of aquatic plants. There have been some advancements, especially from ADA, in popularizing terrestrially-grown "aquascapes", but they always lack the nuance and mystery of an aquatic environment.

I care far, far more about the plants I grow than the fish I keep. Sure, I care about the fish too, but plants are the focus of the hobby for me. Not having fish, or keeping few fish, means that there are fewer changes to nutrient levels through fish waste, and CO2 can be cranked without threat to the inhabitants.

Fish are just one part of the hobby. In America, "fish tanks" FAR outweigh "aquascapes" in popularity and common knowledge. I'm always baffled by statements like "what's the point" in any preference-based hobby, because the point is to just do what you like. Is there a "point" to gardening without livestock to accompany it? Is there a point to keeping flowers, instead of growing tomatoes?

These are my aquatic gardens, and I love and care for the plants within them, simple as that. I've never called my aquascapes my "fish tanks", because the tanks aren't about fish for me, they're about the plants, the scapes, and the artistry of combining and maintaining all of it.

For the record, I usually do keep fish in most of my tanks, but only to add life, movement, and beauty. I take care of them well, but I spend far more time admiring, studying, and focusing on the plants than I do the fish. Nothing wrong with either end of the spectrum, just how I prefer the hobby.

If you don't understand the appeal, I get that. "Fish tanks" are what most of us learn about as kids, and as we age very few of us ever truly develop the urge to grow beautiful underwater gardens the way many of us do here at Scape Crunch. If you get a couple of years of robust aquascape plant growth under your belt, there is the chance you'll get what I mean. Successfully planting, growing, shaping, and maintaining these underwater gardens and landscapes is a beautiful art form that combines life, light, color, shaping, spacing, visual weight, negative space, contrasting texture/color/shape, ALL in a nuanced, changing/breathing/living ecosystem. I genuinely think that this hobby (aquascaping, not fish keeping) is one of the most underrated, complex, nuanced, and skillful forms of human expression that has ever existed.
 
Proof:
IMG_9213.webp

I put food in and waited for an hour before most of the group showed up. 😄
Other fish for this tank are still in quarantine.

In Dutch tanks, I consider the plants first and then choose fish that I believe I’ll enjoy and will live comfortably in that environment. In all other tanks, I consider the inhabitants first and try to create an environment they will enjoy and still be pleasant for me. I got into this hobby because of the fish, and only later learned about the art of aquascaping.
 
I am seeing a bunch of planted tanks with what seems to be no fish. Is this a popular thing? How many of you guys do this? Is there just so few that you don't really see them in pictures? I guess I am struggling with the point of it. Why not just grow plants out of water? It seems like it would be a whole lot easier. Help me understand the appeal.
I hate terrestrial gardening, or even mowing the lawn. Maybe that comes from my childhood when I had o do it as part of my chores.

I love aquatic gardening. It is my zen. The fish are just along for the ride....or swim.
 
I consider the inhabitants first and try to create an environment they will enjoy and still be pleasant for me.
Same for me. But how great that a glass box full of water can give joy to everyone from fish-only keepers to plant-only keepers and everyone in between.
 
plants are the focus of the hobby for me

Just the opposite here 😎 I'm an animal guy first, last, and always 👍💯

The purpose of putting together beautiful plants, for me, is to build a gorgeous, dense, stable environment for shrimp and fish and snails to climb and clean and school and breed and do all the endlessly delightful things they do all day 😁

That means compromises, like keeping KH in the 7° range, which rules out certain plants. Keeping CO2 on the lower end which slows down growth. Keeping an eagle eye on pH so the snails don't melt 💯💯

And for the same reasons I don't like to introduce animals to any scape until it's fully stable and safe for them.. Which has a tendency to create some pretty spectacular lead times 🤣

And a shortage of fish pics 👍

I guess I am struggling with the point of it. Why not just grow plants out of water?

I'm assuming you're at least half kidding 💯 is growing aquarium plants for plants' sake a popular thing? It is!

Short answer is, because we can 😁😁 Given the opportunity to have an intricate, beautiful, growing underwater zoo full of boxes of sunlight in my house, that's what's fun for me 🎉
 
Last edited:
I'm assuming you're at least half kidding 💯 is growing aquarium plants for plants' sake a popular thing? It is!

The whole is post is partially in jest. I really enjoy looking at the aquascapes of planted tanks and I completely understand the husbandry that goes into creation and maintaining a planted tank.

I had aquariums, salt and fresh, as a child and a young adult. Several years ago I came back to the hobby and have been keeping reef systems. Undebatable, saltwater fish are cooler than freshwater. However it was the coral, which was new to me, that have interested me the most. Coral are like plants…..

I have to tinker with something and for me creating ecosystems where living things can thrive does that for me. My reef systems are thriving and on autopilot right now. So why not planted tanks?

If you get a couple of years of robust aquascape plant growth under your belt, there is the chance you'll get what I mean.
Perhaps, but I think I will always want a school of some fish for more interest.


On a side note, I sold some coral this week. It was enough for me to buy a co2 injection system.
 

Top 10 Trending Threads

Back
Top