Hello Rocco & SC community. I’m setting up a new 120P tank. I have two Oase BMT2 350’s. I am running the output of one of them through a UV disinfection unit I purchased from cuboid aquatics. I am running the output of the second through a small acrylic yugang reactor from ARC. I haven’t put water in the tank yet - playing with hardscape now. I’m aware that folks on scapecrunch community have been working through using the reactor and concerns over flow rate. Any suggestions for me?First off, I have tried every form of CO2 injection under the sun.
On smaller tanks, in-tank diffusers are simple and get the job done with little fuss, so I run those.
On larger tanks (50 gallons and above) I have always had issues with CO2 injection.
Enter: The Yugang Horizontal Reactor (forum post here)!
- If I used in-tank diffusers, they had to produce a TON of bubbles to reach a 1.0-1.2 pH drop (30ppm CO2).
- If I used in-line diffusers, they worked better than in tank, but still produced a ton of "sprite water" and would eventually start working poorly after a few months. A few professionals I've spoken to believe that the ceramic body inside the in-line diffuser is a "consumable" part, and cleaning/eventual replacement is part of the tank's lifespan.
- I tried the more common "vertical" spin-type CO2 reactor (also from Aqua Rocks), and while it was able to eventually reach a 1.0pH drop on my 55gal and did eliminate "sprite water", it would require a HUGE Co2 gas pocket built up through , made a ton of noise with the water vortex, and seriously slowed my Oase filter flow down quite noticeably, and gassed my fish a couple of times.
What a brilliant idea. Low maintenance, little flow impedance, NO noise, 100% CO2 dissolve rate, and built-in maximum adjustability (with reactors that have an off-center return/outlet). So so smart... I had to try it!
The basics are covered in the link above
View attachment 7179
I had to cut the built-in locked mounting plates so I could two 6" holes in the inner walls of my stand just to fit this design. I did it with a jigsaw (the acrylic is super easy to cut and sand into a smooth 6" diameter:
View attachment 7180
The one downside is it is really really HUGE. Besides my filters, this is the largest piece of equipment for the tank.The photos don't do it justice, this thing is massive. It's over two feet long with the outflow attachments, 4 inches in diameter at the acrylic tube, and the outer "plates" are just under 6 inches in diameter if you don't include the mounting plates.
It comes with "locked" mounting plates, but you can rotate the inflow/outflow plates by moving the blue screw holes by 1 screw in either direction. It's not a bad idea, but one of the main benefits of a horizontal reactor is the offset outflow (see left side above). On other horizontal reactor designs, you are able to rotate the outflow to adjust the CO2 pocket "overflow". This sets a maximum-sized CO2 pocket, which determines the max CO2 dissolve rate, and helps as a built-in safety feature to prevent gassing of your tank's inhabitants.
See the stainless steel horizontal Yugang reactor from Aqua Rocks:
View attachment 7181
Honestly, I could have gone with the stainless steel version. I would have only needed to cut a 4" diameter hole in my stand's walls vs 6" (since the reactor is easily removed from the ring-mounting-clamps), and it freely rotates without "segmented" rotation like the default Acrylic reactor (meaning, before you saw off the acrylic mounting plates like I did).
However, you can't see what's going on inside the stainless steel reactors. That was the deciding factor for me between these reactors.
The first few days/weeks of using this reactor, being able to see inside has been amazing for troubleshooting, adjusting, and understanding what's going on.
However, now that I know how easy it is to set one of these up, and I have firsthand in-person experience seeing the mechanics with an acrylic reactor, I would consider a stainless steel reactor in the future.
How do you set one of these up?
Rotate the reactor until the top of the offset-outflow hole is just barely touching the level of CO2 pocket height you want to try:
View attachment 7182
Original graphics by @Yugang , the rest by me!
Results to follow...
Thank you,
Joe
