I am looking forward to a @Jeff Miotke MDI inspired scape using all Pink Granite….
Take lots of pictures to bring home….
Take lots of pictures to bring home….
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My sister has published with Amazon’s “Kindle Direct Publishing” where they only print the books as they are ordered, so there is no pre-printing overhead. Her work is an all original artwork children’s book and she is very fussy over the quality. They printed some samples for her approval and made some changes based on her feedback. She is very pleased with the outcome.Yea I looked into all that. Anything I produce would be very photo heavy as it is visual art. Which makes the financials ugly as the publishers have a lot of costs for either printing or online to distribute. In the end it just doesn't make sense as I'd probably not even be able to rub two dimes together after it was all done. Thankfully Youtube seems to be working ok for distributing what I want to share with the world.
Same here, I know his name among the elite but that’s as far as my knowledge of him goes. I can’t wait to dive into your channel @Jeff MiotkeI had never once come across your channel until Art mentioned it here![]()
Yep, aquatic plants need Carbon the most, that's an scientific fact which will stay around I guess. Most definitely a non CO2 supplemented tank can run into troubles, when plants mass exceeds a certain level of what a tank can produce CO2 by itself. At that point the low CO2 scavengers and species which use HCO3 as a carbon source (like Vallisneria) survive. The rest get sick due to carbon starvation/CO2 depletion (<0.5 ppm), and algae appears. Scarcity always ends up in survival of the fittest.Low tech tanks that work well, work well because they generate adequate carbon naturally. There are no plants that "don't require CO2", though there are plant species that scavenge low CO2 levels more efficiently. In examples where setups can generate substantial amount of CO2 (such as Sudipta shaw's experiments), pickier species can grow well. One way to generate CO2 is through soil microbial action. Her book mentions this but with no concrete data, and doesn't describe principles to get a soil to generate CO2 - and this single action of soil is what makes low soil tanks successful. Multilayering? grain size? organic content? flow control? off gassing yes or no? how to practically replant stuff in soil substrates?
We need a better flag bearer for low tech tanks in general.
On the soil CO2 generation side, from my own experiments, certain soil mixes definitely work better than others. I had a soil mix (3 inch soil to 8 inch water ratio) that generated 18ppm of CO2 when left standing overnight. And I think that the future of low tech tank refinement lies in maximizing carbon generation through manipulating soil mixes. Unfortunately I have little commercial interest in refining this approach, as our (2hr Aquarist) customer base are mostly at the opposite end of the spectrum (high tech users, difficult plant selection).
Yep looked into this and the book price would be too much due to the pictures. Amazon has a calculator on the site to adjust what you want to publish versus the cost. The pictures would be everything for what I want to do. So I got stuck and went with YouTube….which is no picnic either.My sister has published with Amazon’s “Kindle Direct Publishing” where they only print the books as they are ordered, so there is no pre-printing overhead. Her work is an all original artwork children’s book and she is very fussy over the quality. They printed some samples for her approval and made some changes based on her feedback. She is very pleased with the outcome.
I don’t know much of the details, but it might be worth looking into for your ideas, Jeff.
Yea it is seriously rough going. Im maxing out my abilities on each video. So Ill keep creating and see what happens.YouTube pushes videos based on views, comments, subscribers, thumbs up, and viralness.
The channels that have a good number of subs are generating a LOT more of that sort of data for the algorithm to say hey let's push this.
If your channel doesn't have the subs, well you gotta keep releasing good content with great thumbnails and cross your fingers haha.
Yea, I definitely missed the “easy mode” days when you could just share whatever thoughts you had and still grow a big following.Does YouTube offer you a way to influence the SEO they use to rank and promote?
I'd consider myself a low to moderate user, but almost all my searches and views are aquascaping. Still no matter the search terms, YouTube just pushes (occasional new and endless repeats of old) content from George Farmer / GreenAqua / ADA / Tropica / SerpaDesign /MJ Aquascaping / Corey andMD Fishtanks
.
Interspersed with random overseas content and occasionally Juris and The Cinescaper.
I had never once come across your channel until Art mentioned it here![]()
Oh yea its terrible. FB and InstagramIn social media, the users are the product. It only makes sense for the platform to try to make money from the content creators once they max out paid ads.
Facebook is the same way. I have a bunch of friends but only a fraction actually see a post a make. Of course, Facebook book shows me how many more would see it if I paid to promote it.
George Farmer?Georges book is pretty thorough.
Totally agree on that one.Not defending Father Fish, but choosing plants that will grow well in a low-tech environment isn’t really any different than the advice to grow plants “that like the soup you’re serving” which is generally accepted as good advice.
Still, there is something to be said for being seen…. You wont get the same percentage of those folks to convert to regular viewers as you do with people who have the channel recommended by a fellow enthusiast, But if it comes to the knowledge of the right person and they spread the word…I looked into YouTube’s option to promote videos for views or followers. At first, it felt a bit off, so I dug deeper. Turns out it can get your content in front of more eyes—for a price—but it doesn’t really help build a real community. It’s more of a short-term ego boost than a long-term strategy, so I decided it wasn’t for me.
Last part of chapter 8. Looking now, its nothing really earth shattering. I just remembered at the time thinking hmm thats pretty good.George Farmer?
Ok, dug out my copy. Joe, can you outline where he discusses trimming? Definitely an area I need to improve on as far as aesthetically trimming plants
I think a lot of people who love George’s contribution to the hobby felt that way, but he never advertised it to be an elite aquascaping guide. I myself purchased it out of support but realized quickly that the book’s intention was more inspiration to pursue the hobby and its benefits rather than a “how to” guide.Thanks.
I remember buying the book and being rather disappointed after getting it.
It just wasnt what I had been hoping for. It is a very nice coffee table book with great photos, but mostly an introduction to aquascaping for beginners.. It mostly left me with wanting more details.
It certainly isnt a reference I return to in order to refresh on details.