Welcome to ScapeCrunch

We are ScapeCrunch, the place where planted aquarium hobbyists come to build relationships and support each other. When you're tired of doom scrolling, you've found your home here.

Journal Inert Sand Trials || 150x60x60cm, 140gal, Horizontal Reactor + Blasting Sand Journal

Naturescapes_Rocco

Rocco
Supporting
Rockstar
Article Contributor
Journal
Joined
Dec 19, 2024
Messages
555
Reaction score
1,388
Location
Denver, Colorado, USA
With the algae-free success of my 39gal Experimental Tank, which uses completely inert sand and 100% water column fertilization (no aquasoil or root tabs), I learned so much about the actual science of this hobby.

I found that I really loved having a substrate where I was in full control; where nutrients were neither released nor absorbed, and where the entire water chemistry could be decided by me. And best of all, I've had the most algae-free success of my life with this smaller experimental tank!

Once I was able to start growing a dwarf hairgrass carpet in this completely inert sand, I realized I wanted to try that in my large 150p showcase tank. Welcome to:



Inert Sand Trials, Version 1​

One successful inert sand tank could always be a fluke. Two successful inert sand tanks? Now, that's getting serious!

Main goals of this tank:​

  • Prove to myself that my current understanding of DIY fertilization can genuinely work (nothing is provided by the substrate)
  • Challenge myself by re-creating the setup with the same hardscape as before, to help with comparisons before and after
  • Learn to use an inert, unchanging substrate on a massive gallery-quality setup
  • See if inert substrates are really better suited for long-term setups!
  • Save some money with an incredibly cheaper substrate setup
  • Make 3 major upgrades:
    • Larger Horizontal Reactor for running in regulator (NOT overflow) mode
    • Massive 55W UV sterilizer
    • Upgrading tubing/prefilter/lily pipes/pump size to 1" diameter with no smaller choke points



In my previous build of this tank, I started with 9 bags of aquasoil, and eventually used almost 12 full bags in this tank:
1762823456865.webp
At $62/9L, I spent ~$750 on the aquasoil necessary to fill the previous setup properly, and that was with using cheap lava rock mesh bags underneath in the back to add height!

To start this setup, I needed a substrate.

In my experimental tank, I used medium grit Black Diamond Blasting Sand (BDBS ). Black Diamond is the brand, and Blasting Sand is the inert "coal slag" commonly used in this hobby:
1762823612796.webp
One 50lb bag is approx 3.5gal, or 13.2L.
  • Aquasoil is approx $6.2/L
  • BDBS is approx $1.14/L.
But wait! I found a local supplier of Black Beauty Blasting Sand (BBBS?) here in Denver. The SDS from the Black Beauty is almost identical to the SDS from Black Diamond. Here's a sample from them:
1762824109816.webp
BDBS and Black Beauty are almost identical. BDBS is a bit darker but BB has a larger consistent

At United Western Denver, I picked up 7 bags (350lbs) for only $76. That's less than $11/bag, or $0.83/L .

In the end, I would only use 5 bags for this tank and return the bags, so it cost me less than $56 for the entire substrate of this aquarium. Versus $750 in aquasoil. I saved almost $700 by using BDBS (!!!!)

1762824303609.webp
7 bags for $76

1762825041808.webp


To use Blasting Sand, you need to rinse thoroughly:​



1762825220580.webp1762825220628.webp
1762825248939.webp
It often has a dusty, oily residue at first. Rinse REALLY well until it's clear!

There are also 3 major points of upgrade that this tank will be receiving:​


1) A much larger Horizontal Reactor
2) A massive 55W HO UV Sterilizer
3) Upgrading to 1" (24/31mm) tubing size, with no choke points, across the entire stand



1762825766412.webp
Tommy, the owner of ARC, let me purchase his original prototype acrylic reactor -- which is almost 50% larger than their regular large size.

1) Upgrading reactor size​


The reason for upgrading the horizontal reactor is simple: I don't like running my horizontal reactors in overflow mode.

I prefer getting a guaranteed 100% CO2 injection rate, especially with my flowmeters. It's less confounding variables at play, and I waste less CO2.

However, running a reactor in regulator mode not only requires a really good needle valve, it also can build up a gas pocket over time filled with O2 and N2 gasses. If the reactor is too small, it will need to be purged or the splashing noise inside will drive you crazy.

The larger the reactor is, the smaller this "other" gas pocket is. A larger reactor will either never develop a large gas pocket at it's equilibrium, or helps by extending the lenght of time between manual gas purges required. Not a problem for me, as long as I reach 7+ days before needing to purge the reactor! In the previous setup with the "Large" size, I needed to purge every 5-6 days due to splashing noise.

1762826871563.webp
I 3D printed some custom flanges for the 6" holes in the stand walls to accommodate the reactor.

It also means if I ever want to try a larger tank, like 300 gallons, this can be used for that, too!


2) Adding a 55W Lifeguard Pro-Max Amaglam UV Sterilizer​

I run a 7W sterilizer on my experimental tank, and I had a 14W sterilizer on this 150p tank previously. They are not necessary, but I do find that they help prevent some algae and MASSIVELY improve the water clarity. I thought my water was crystal clear , until I installed the 14W sterilizer on the tank. Since I was upgrading these things, I decided to get a "buy it for life" sterilizer:
1762826674864.webp
1762826795834.webp
It's a bit messy, but it works! 55W of Level 1 sterilization achieved!



3) Upgrading to 1" tubing/equipment/lily pipes​


This was the hardest part of this build, but I really wanted to give it a try.

The current system is setup with 16/22mm (aka 5/8") tubing. This is standard aquascaping/canister filter size tubing, but I wanted... more flow. MUCH more flow.

The system is setup in this order:

  1. Intake Lily Pipe
  2. Prefilter
  3. Horizontal reactor
  4. UV Sterilizer
  5. Optimax return pump
  6. Return lily pipe
First, I needed larger lily pipes. The only place that even HAS stainless steel ones is Aqua Rocks Colorado (ARC):
1762827168476.webp
I cannot explain just how much larger these 1" pipes are. They're like police batons. Massive!

Tommy also carries a 1" version of the Netlea Prefilter (which is fucking awesome). It's listed as "22mm" but it's not, it's definitely for 1" tubing:

Untitled-7.webp

The final "boss" was the Horizontal Reactor. The adapters are 5/8", and I wanted full 1" tubing to have access.

To fix this, I learned how to solvent weld acrylic plastic with Weld-On 3:
First, I practiced drilling and solvent-welding 1" acrylic tubing into a thick piece of scrap acrylic:
1762827648006.webp
1762827664936.webp
Solvent welding acrylic with Weld-On 3 or Weld On 4 literally makes it one piece of plastic. The sheet will break before the joint does (I tried with a hammer, the sheet cracks before the joint even budges!)

Then, I drilled the reactor's acrylic end caps, and solvent-welded in a 1" piece of pipe as the hose barb:
1762827758479.webp

I drilled another hole for a 1/4" RO line bulkhead to inject the CO2 gas, and capped off the original in/out with a removeable PVC cap:

1762827893132.webp
Ready for use! I will just use 1" hose clamps on the silicone hose to attach it to the reactor.



Was it worth it? Did it really upgrade the flow to change everything to 1" diameter?​


Yes. It was worth it.

When using a 1-gallon pitcher, measuring multiple times, I'm getting somewhere between 1,300 and 1,500 gallons per hour. That's more than what this pump is rated at, flowing through a prefilter, CO2 reactor AND a UV sterilizer.

Here's a video of the flow. It does not do it justice; this one point of water return will literally uproot plants from the substrate and make the tank like a whirlwind:



My fish will be like
1762828411104.webp

Currently, I have the pump running at about 1/3rd speed (can be adjusted on the pump itself). Who knew that 1" upgrade would be so good? Maybe the standard 16/22mm size is restrictive for larger aquariums.
 

Attachments

  • 1762825756143.webp
    1762825756143.webp
    204 bytes · Views: 4
Last edited:
IMG_3453.webpIMG_3457.webp
Using crushed lava rock bags as the base for height, and to keep the BDBS depth to less than 4-5"

IMG_3458.webp
I took the time to powerwash the driftwood to remove algae and parasite-like moss fragments. I also wanted to saw/shape some of the pieces, but this red wood from ARC is so hard it broke my Sawzall blade. It was easier to drill a bunch of holes in a line, and break through with an axe.

Also, I took this opportunity to drill multiple "planting" holes into the different driftwood pieces, and "round" off the unnattural front piece's flat end.
These "planting" holes are perfect for stuffing buce, java fern, and monte carlo/HC cuba into without the need for glue. I love it so far!


IMG_3474.webp
Not a true replication of the original, but close enough!

IMG_3492.webp
The freshly powerwashed wood began releasing tannins. I cycled the tank for ~7 days, adding 2ppm ammonia per day, to kickstart the cycle. With dosing ammonia, PO4, and the crazy flow from the upgraded filter setup, the tank fully cycled by day 8.

IMG_3493.webp
Tannins suck. They'll stop with water changes and once the wood gets covered in microscopic biofilm.

IMG_3494.webp

After 7 days and a water change, I dosed the empty aquarium to my targets:
  • Primary Macros
  • Secondary Macros (remineralizers)
    • 25ppm Ca
    • 6ppm Mg
  • Micros
    • Burr Micro Mix, daily dosed via autodoser

IMG_3552.webp
The tannins self-stained the wood darker already.


Plant prep and planting​

I think plant prep is poorly explained, and often not practiced.

I believe it's CRITICAL to know how to prepare plants for planting. Removing as much emersed growth as possible, while leaving some foliage for photosynthesis, helps prevent melting/rotting/DOC release in your fresh, unstable tank.

Here, I removed SO many leaves on my Cyperus Helferi. Be brutal about it -- if a leaf isn't healthy, remove it. It it has algae, REMOVE IT.

The Cyperus helferi took an hour to prepare alone. Just put on some music, get your spring scissors, and meticulously trim your plants and set them aside:

IMG_3524.webp

I spent the first 8 hours I had available doing nothing but plant prep. I had about 120 stems of Staurogyne repens, and I make sure to trim every stem to 1.5" long leaving only the top 2-4 leaves, and removing all leaves below it, manually. 8 hours of plant prep better be worth it:
IMG_3553.webpIMG_3557.webp
Planting is also just as monotonous. This is the next day, 5 hours in.

Plant list:​

Foreground:
  • Dwarf Hairgrass 'Mini'
  • Staurogyne Repens
Midground:
  • Blyxa japonica
  • AR Mini
  • Hygrophila corymbosa 'compact'
  • Rotala bonsai
  • Penthorum sedoides (in the gap between front and middle driftwood)
  • Crypt wendtii 'bronze'
Background:
  • Cyperus helferi
  • Rotala rotundifolia (the OG! Not blood red)
Epiphytes/Rheophytes:
  • Java Fern 'India' (left, on driftwood)
  • Java Fern 'needle leaf' (left, behind driftwood, not visible yet)
  • Regular/full Java Fern (right, wedged between middle and backmost driftwood)
  • Anubias Nana
  • Assorted Buce species
  • Monte Carlo (stuffed into hole on left/main driftwood)
  • HC Cuba (growing out of emersed form into submerged form in another tank, will drape on driftwood like moss, maybe replacing Monte Carlo!)
IMG_3564.webpIMG_3571.webpIMG_3569.webpIMG_3577.webp
The rotala rotundifolia arrived in it's emersed form, so I'll have to grow it out


IMG_3573.webp
Monte Carlo plug as an epiphyte

IMG_3574.webp
Assorted buce

IMG_3572.webp
top-down view of the tank from the left side.

IMG_3566.webp

Starting this tank off differently​

Unlike with aquasoil-based tanks, I plan on full dosing the water column from the get-go.

I'll add Ca, Mg, and K via dry powders after WC, and dose a Macro solution for the remaining NPK. I'll do a double-dose of macros after WC to recover levels, and a regular dose halfway through the week for really stable nutrient levels. I will continue with 70% weekly water changes as I currently do with all my tanks!

My target weekly levels are:

30ppm NO3 (dosed 20ppm after WC, and 10ppm midweek)
9ppm PO4 (dosed 6ppm after WC, and 3ppm midweek)
39ppm K (~16ppm dosed alongside Ca and Mg, while the other ~27ppm comes from the KNO3 and KH2PO4 macro solution)
~25ppm Ca
~6ppm Mg
~0.5ppm Fe via Burr Micros, dosed daily via autodoser

This is all balanced with a 70% weekly WC. If you want to understand how nutrients accumulate, use my calculator!

Thanks for reading! If you want to receive updates, leave a comment or click "watch" at the top of the thread.​

 

Attachments

  • IMG_3573.webp
    IMG_3573.webp
    94.5 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_3567.webp
    IMG_3567.webp
    196.4 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_3566.webp
    IMG_3566.webp
    108.5 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:
Maybe I missed it but I don't recall seeing a full livestock list on the experimental tank, but based on photos, it was very lightly stocked. What about this tank?
The experiment tank is super lightly stocked, but the previous version of this tank was pretty stocked!

The current livestock list for this tank (currently in a holding tank) is:
  • ~28 Kyathit danios (and they get pretty large!)
  • 20+ White clouds
  • 5 juvenile panda garras
  • 4 pea puffers (lost one early on, but remaining 4 are getting 'big' and even breeding, though the fry don't survive long
  • 3 Otocinclus
  • 5 large Juli Corys
  • 2 large bristlenose plecos
  • ~20 clear/brown wild type neos
I lost the SAEs and all 10 rainbow shiners in the holding tank for whatever reason, while I didn't lose a single other fish. Maybe those two species were sensitive to ammonia or some disease was triggered due to the stress?

Either way, this tank will definitely be much more stocked than the experimental tank.

Also thinking of some Giant Danios, which would love the current and temperature!
 
Hey,
thank you for such a detailed report! The look /blackness of this BDBS is exceptional. I think i will try this too, was worried it might contain some bad ingredients/byproducts. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
The xomposition of the wood also looks fantastic.
The macro and CO2 input is far too high for my taste, but everyone has different preferences.
May I ask for the photoperiod/percent of the hyperspot?
looking forward to next episode
 
Hey,
thank you for such a detailed report! The look /blackness of this BDBS is exceptional. I think i will try this too, was worried it might contain some bad ingredients/byproducts. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
I had been worried too, but when so many legends in the hobby use it successfully I gave it a try in the experiment tank and it's been great with zero issues! I'd definitely recommend.

May I ask for the photoperiod/percent of the hyperspot?
All of my tanks run approx. 9am to 5pm for the bulk of the photoperiod. There is usually a 15-45minute ramp up/down on each end, so it ends up being ~8.5-9 hours of light per day.

Lights are set to 70% on my experimental tank right now, and for this tank I have them at 50% and raising by 5% each day. With 40ppm CO2 and high macros, I could theoretically blast them at 100% and not get crazy algae, but I don't want to keep up with plant growth. I'll probably stop the gradual rise somewhere around 70-80%, which is usually 200 PAR at the substrate and closer to 350PAR or more at the surface (tested with Photone app with cosine diffuser).
 
Last edited:
Looking forward to seeing this project continue to evolve. Looking good so far.

Can you shed some light on your thought process of increasing the diameter of the piping and then running the pump throttled back to 1/3 output? Is the current, throttled throughput still higher than the previous iteration with the smaller tubing? What led to your desire to increase flow beyond what you had in the previous iteration?
 
The only caution I’ve heard about BDBS is that it isn’t consistent from bag to bag and may sometimes contain harmful materials to shrimp. I know many people have used it successfully in non-shrimp tanks though.
I'll report here about it! I haven't had any inhabitant losses, including shrimp and snails, in the experimental tank. Rinsing really well and lots of water changes should take care of whatever could be in the sand, but we'll see if shrimp do well in this tank regardless!

What led to your desire to increase flow beyond what you had in the previous iteration?
In the previous version the flow was... acceptable?. One in and one out lily pipe, in the standard 16/22mm size, was enough for a successful tank. However, I noticed areas of the tank that received very little flow (front bottom left) and I could tell I could benefit from a bit more flow.
Honestly I just became obsessed with the idea of trying it out, since very few tanks out there run a full fluval-hose-size setup (1") on high end aquascapes. I like exploring new frontiers in this hobby...
1762882903972.webp

Once I tested the flow on the upgrade, it was WAY more than an upgrade. I thought it might improve flow...
But I forgot about the way radius (diameter) affects a circle's area:

1762883013805.webp
1762883027501.webp

The upgrade was MORE than 100% in terms of useable flow-volume, which is reflected in the massive flow boost.

Can you shed some light on your thought process of increasing the diameter of the piping and then running the pump throttled back to 1/3 output?
My thought process was "damn this is way too much flow lol"
Is the current, throttled throughput still higher than the previous iteration with the smaller tubing?
Yes, definitely much higher!
 
I enjoy all of your articles/journals. I’m just saying that if it’s true that the bags aren’t consistent, your experience with BDBS may not be the same as some other people’s experience, so if using with shrimp they should be cautious. Maybe test it out with a few cheap shrimp for a few months before moving on to a couple dozen expensive ones…
 
Where on earth did you find these?
Aquaswap on Reddit! They were sold $1/ea as shrimp culls from other user's tanks. I just picked them up to help with decaying plant matter and as a potential food source. The largest ones are super healthy, over a year old, but the smallest ones probably get eaten quite often!
 
To fix this, I learned how to solvent weld acrylic plastic with Weld-On 3:
Look Aquarium MacGyver, you're going to have to slow your roll for us normal people. 😝

Honestly, amazing build, and I look forward to following along.

I hope you haven't mentioned this, but why are you starting so high with the macro levels? Is it because without aquasoil providing the N, you want to make sure there is extra/plenty? It would make sense to me. Or is it that it is just what you have found to work best with your double dose front load with one catch up dose regimen? What will be a regular dose for you? 10ppm NO3?
 
How much are you flowing through your Lifegard 55w?
I’m considering the same unit and emailed the company about flowrates as they only list max flows (no mins.) and my tank will only be pumping 900gph.
I found this on a reef site, though:
View attachment 11652
Probably ~1,000-1,200GPH (since I've turned the pump strength down). For 55W, that should be slow enough for decent sterilization which is why I went with 55W for this setup. It won't sterilize mobile fish diseases, but should really help with clarifying the water via sterilizing bacterial blooms and suspended algae. The slower the better, in general, so for your 900GPH setup a 55W would really be something!

Also, there isn't really "minimum" flow rates for UV sterilizers -- the slower the flow, the greater the sterilization effect. If you want high flow, you need a much larger/powerful sterilizer.

The only thing regarding "too slow" flow, as far as I understand, is that the UV bulb and quartz sleeve can really start to get warm if the flow is stagnant. If the flow is way too slow, like pushing 100GPH through a 90W sterilizer, you might end up reducing the lifespan on the bulb/housing, or even potentially melt something.

That's why I always set up my GHL Profilux computer to turn off the UV sterilizer when I turn off the filter pump.
 
Look Aquarium MacGyver, you're going to have to slow your roll for us normal people. 😝
😅
I hope you haven't mentioned this, but why are you starting so high with the macro levels? Is it because without aquasoil providing the N, you want to make sure there is extra/plenty? It would make sense to me.
After spending so much time learning about accumulation, and dosing a rich water column, I don't see these macro levels as "so high" anymore!
That's the beauty of not using aquasoil -- the setup is very replicate-able.
Or is it that it is just what you have found to work best with your double dose front load with one catch up dose regimen?
This is more the reason -- because it works in my successful inert sand tank, where ALL the nutrients and balancing are coming from DIY dosing and water changes, I "know" it will work in this tank, too. Because the soil is no longer a variable (inert sand which never changes, has low CEC , etc), it allows me to replicate similar success. In fact, the only thing different between the tanks is one has driftwood, and one doesn't.
What will be a regular dose for you? 10ppm NO3?
I try to thing of dosing in terms of weekly total IN RESPECT TO weekly water change %. Without the context of what your weekly water change % is, ppms don't tell you anything (credit to @Burr740 for teaching me that!).

I dose 30ppm NO3 per week total. I can only do that because I change 70% water each week.

For dosing 30ppm NO3 weekly, at 3ppm NO3 consumption per day, with a 70% weekly WC, I get this in my nutrient calculator:
1763061892875.webp

Even though I'm dosing a "high" 30ppm NO3 per week, the actual value hovers, on average, at 17.5ppm across many months. Which really isn't that high, despite dosing 30ppm total per week! Hence what I mean by saying I don't see these levels as very high.


If my WC % was more like 50%, I'd lower the total weekly dose to 25ppm NO3 for similar results:
1763062126161.webp



Hope this makes sense!
 

Top 10 Trending Threads

Back
Top